Foren Suche

  • Who we are and what we doDatum09.12.2016 22:22
    Foren-Beitrag von carlos im Thema Who we are and what we do
  • MAF HaitiDatum09.12.2016 22:22
    Foren-Beitrag von carlos im Thema MAF Haiti
  • MAF HaitiDatum09.12.2016 22:22
    Thema von carlos im Forum MAF - Mission Aviation...

    Mission Aviation Fellowship has had a program in Haiti since 1986 with the goal of furthering God's Kingdom by supporting the missions and development community with safe and reliable air transportation. MAF Haiti flies three planes in Haiti and services 13 airstrips around Haiti. The MAF team is made up of 6 missionary families and 12 staff members. MAF routinely responds to medical evacuation needs as well as flying charters for work teams and regular service to Jeremie and Dame Marie. Please contact us if there is anything that we can assist you or your organization with. We look forward to flying with you in the future.

  • Who we are and what we doDatum09.12.2016 22:21
    Thema von carlos im Forum MAF - Mission Aviation...

    AF is a family of organizations led by people in countries around the world who have a similar vision of taking Christ’s love into the most remote places on earth. MAF-US collaborates with our sister organizations to meet spiritual and physical needs in 37 different countries. Collectively, our fleet of 135 airplanes serves some 1,500 non-profit, churches, and humanitarian organizations.

    You'll find MAF in the hardest-to-reach locations, where people live isolated from the rest of the world, cut off from the most basic necessities. Our highly trained pilots maneuver Cessna and KODIAK aircraft through rugged terrain. And while passengers might hold their breath, MAF pilots skillfully land at short, unimproved airstrips on the sides of mountains, in jungle clearings, or on tropical rivers—to bring medicine and doctors, disaster relief, education, evangelists, Bible translators, food supplies, agriculture and clean water projects, and more. Why do we do it? Because we’re passionate about sharing Christ's love beyond where the road ends.

  • On September 6, 2016, a new definition of oral health was overwhelmingly approved by the FDI World Dental Federation General Assembly. This was a key part of the organization’s advocacy and strategic plan—Vision 2020.1 The definition, together with a companion framework, creates an opportunity for the profession to reflect on what oral health encompasses and what the implications are of this definition for clinical practice and oral health policy. But why was a new definition needed?

    Although oral health has been recognized for millennia to be an essential component of overall health and well-being, it has not been clear whether oral health has meant the same thing for different components of our profession and for our stakeholders. And if we are uncertain as a profession what we mean, how can we explain ourselves clearly to our patients, other health care professionals, policy makers, and those others we seek to collaborate with and inform? A common definition can bring stakeholders together to advocate for the importance of oral health; to influence and shape parameters of care, health policies, research, education, and reimbursement models; and to shape the future of our profession. During the creation of FDI’s Vision 2020,1 it became evident that there was a need for a universally accepted definition of oral health, one that conveys that oral health is a fundamental human right and that facilitates the inclusion of oral health in all policies. To accomplish this goal, the FDI charged a newly created Think Tank with producing such a definition.
    -

    The new definition acknowledges the multifaceted nature and attributes of oral health.

    A definition was needed that included the full scope of health and well-being and, ultimately, one that could be agreed on by all. Traditionally, oral health has been defined as the absence of disease. This definition fails to account for a person’s values, perceptions, and expectations. Furthermore, existing definitions of oral health mostly lack a theoretical framework that can be used to address all of the domains and elements that are part of oral health. The new definition acknowledges the multifaceted nature and attributes of oral health (Box) . Alongside the proposed concise definition, a companion framework was developed to describe the complex interactions among the 3 core elements of oral health (disease and condition status, physiological function, and psychosocial function), a range of driving determinants (elements that influence and determine oral health), moderating factors (factors that determine or affect how a person scores his or her oral health), and, finally, overall health and well-being (Figure) . (A powerpoint version of the new definition of oral health and its accompanying framework can be downloaded at http://www.fdiworldental.org/oral-health...ral-health.aspx.)
    +
    Box

    Definition of oral health.
    Thumbnail image of Figure. Opens large image
    Figure

    Framework for the oral health definition. The core elements of oral health are as follows: disease and condition status refers to a threshold of severity or a level of progression of disease, which also includes pain and discomfort; physiological function refers to the capacity to perform a set of actions that include, but are not limited to, the ability to speak, smile, chew, and swallow; and psychosocial function refers to the relationship between oral health and mental state that includes, but is not limited to, the capacity to speak, smile, and interact in social and work situations without feeling uncomfortable or embarrassed. Driving determinants are factors that affect oral health and cover 5 main domains: genetic and biological factors, social environment, physical environment, health behaviors, and access to care. In turn, driving determinants nest within systems that can support or serve as a barrier to maintaining and promoting oral health and managing oral diseases and conditions. Moderating factors are elements that determine or affect how a person scores his or her oral health and include, but are not limited to, age, culture, income, experience, expectations, and adaptability.

    View Large Image | Download PowerPoint Slide

    In addition to the creation of a theoretical framework, there are several other advantages associated with adoption of this new definition of oral health. The new definition



    echoes definitions used by the World Health Organization (WHO), national dental associations worldwide, and many other organizations and is, therefore, not a revolution but an evolution of existing definitions;


    moves dentistry from treating disease to providing care and support for oral health;


    uses language that resonates with language commonly used in the health care realm—words and concepts that health care professionals across disciplines can understand and use;


    raises awareness of the different dimensions of oral health and emphasizes that oral health does not occur in isolation but is embedded in the wider framework of overall health.

    FDI represents more than 1 million dentists through its more than 200 national dental associations in more than 130 countries; it represents dentistry at WHO and is a member of the World Health Professions Alliance and the Supporters Consultation Group of the Non-Communicable Disease Alliance.2 The creation of this new definition of oral health and the accompanying framework is intended to be used by all stakeholders and builds on the WHO's Commission on Social Determinants of Health report.3 Accordingly, patients, practicing dentists, academicians, researchers, politicians, third-party payers, industry partners, and medical providers were consulted and included in the creation of the definition.

    Efforts are under way to assess and measure this new definition of oral health, and work in the United States has started, as demonstrated by the American Dental Association Health Policy Institute.4 We now have a definition of oral health that will enable a conversation that creates a common understanding when addressing the needs of people and communities and when making the case for the importance of optimal oral health for all. Let’s get started.
    References

    Glick, M., Monteiro da Silva, M., Seeberger, G.K. et al. FDI Vision 2020: shaping the future of oral health. Int Dent J. 2012; 62: 278–291
    View in Article | Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (32)
    World Dental Federation. FDI in brief. Available at: http://www.fdiworldental.org/about-fdi/f...i-in-brief.aspx. Accessed October 1, 2016.
    World Health Organization. Commission on Social Determinants of Health: final report. Available at: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/t...finalreport/en/. Accessed October 2, 2016.
    American Dental Association Health Policy Institute. Oral health and well-being in the United States. Available at: http://www.ada.org/en/science-research/h...-and-well-being. Accessed October 2, 2016.

    Biography

    Dr. Glick is a professor and the William M. Feagans Chair, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY. He also is the editor of The Journal of the American Dental Association.

    Dr. Williams is a professor, Global Oral Health, Institute of Dentistry, Bart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

    Dr. Kleinman is a professor, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

    Dr. Vujicic is the chief economist and vice president, Health Policy Institute, American Dental Association, Chicago, IL.

    Dr. Watt is a professor and the chair, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

    Dr. Weyant is a professor and the chair, Department of Dental Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Disclosure. The authors did not report any disclosures.

    ORCID Number. Michael Glick: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4236-5385.

    Editorials represent the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the American Dental Association.
    Copyright © 2016 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.

  • Thema von carlos im Forum Global Oral Health

    In The Journal of the American Dental Association’s December editorial, Drs. Michael Glick, David M. Williams, Dushanka V. Kleinman, Marko Vujicic, Richard G. Watt, and Robert J. Weyant discuss how the FDI World Dental Federation’s new definition for oral health creates an opportunity for the dentistry profession.

    On September 6, 2016, a new definition of oral health was overwhelmingly approved by the FDI World Dental Federation General Assembly. This was a key part of the organization’s advocacy and strategic plan – Vision 2020. The definition, together with a companion framework, creates an opportunity for the profession to reflect on what oral health encompasses and what the implications are of this definition for clinical practice and oral health policy. But why was a new definition needed?

    Read the rest of the editorial in the December JADA.

  • Advancing the ProfessionDatum07.11.2016 20:50
    Thema von carlos im Forum IADR International Ass...

    jdh.adha.org/content/89/suppl_1/13.full.pdf

  • Thema von carlos im Forum IADR International Ass...

    he International Association for Dental Research (IADR) aims, through the Global Oral Health Inequalities Research Agenda (GOHIRA) initiative, to articulate an agenda that if properly implemented will reduce inequalities in oral health within a generation. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently asserted: ‘We live in a world in which the burden of disease and ill-health is a major barrier to development and realisation of every individual’s capabilities. Basic, clinical and population research can transform human wellbeing and has the potential to unite and empower countries.’
    Thus, we have a responsibility to ensure that the achievement of improved oral health, with concomitant reduction in the global burden of oral disease, is approached in this way. The IADR GOHIRA initiative places emphasis on transdisciplinary, inter-sectoral research, ensuring that oral health is integrated into strategies to reduce health inequalities in general. Detailed proposals across the major oral/maxillofacial diseases of dental caries, periodontal diseases, oral cancer, oral infections and developmental anomalies, and ways in which these might be implemented recognising the major import of social determinants of health, are now published in a special issue of Advances in Dental Research, May 2011, available at http://adr.sagepub.com/content/23/2.toc.

  • [PDF]January 24, 2013
    www.iadr.org/files/public/13IADR-GOHIRA.pdf

    IADR-Global Oral Health Inequalities Research Agenda®:

  • IADR-Global Oral Health Inequalities Research Agenda®: An IADR Board Call to Action
    Alexandria, Va., USA – Today, the International and American Associations for Dental Research (IADR/AADR) published a special editorial titled “IADR-Global Oral Health Inequalities Research Agenda®: An IADR Board Call to Action.” The key objective of the IADR-Global Oral Health Inequalities: The Research Agenda (IADR-GOHIRA®) is to articulate a research agenda to generate the evidence for a strategy that if properly implemented will reduce inequalities in oral health within a generation. The editorial, by lead author Harold Sgan-Cohen, Hebrew University-Hadassah, is published in the IADR/AADR Journal of Dental Research.
    While there have been major improvements in oral health in the last 30 years, with research leading to remarkable advances in the prevention and treatment of disease, inequalities remain and a marked social gradient in oral health is seen similar to that in general health. Global inequalities in oral health persist both, between and within different regions and societies; and they undermine the fabric, productivity and quality of life of many of the world's peoples.
    IADR recognizes that to date there has been limited success in translating research into effective action to promote global oral health and eliminate inequalities. It is increasingly apparent that addressing this challenge will require closer and more robust engagement across sectors, including social policy, and the adoption of an upstream approach that integrates action on oral health with approaches to reduce the global burden of non-communicable disease in general. The essence of the present Call to Action is to focus the attention of international leaders in oral health research on this issue. IADR is committed to accepting a scientific, social and moral leadership role in achieving this goal.
    The special editorial provides more background about the IADR-GOHIRA and it outlines the IADR-GOHIRA research priorities, the overall aim, and the outcome priorities and timeline for implementation.
    "The IADR Board of Directors is pleased the IADR-GOHIRA effort has captured the imagination of the global health research community,” said IADR President Mary MacDougall. “We look forward to stimulating the research needed to reduce oral health inequalities."
    Visit http://jdr.sagepub.com/content/early/recent to read the complete editorial or contact Ingrid L. Thomas at ithomas@iadr.org to request the PDF.
    About the Journal of Dental Research
    The IADR/AADR Journal of Dental Research is a multidisciplinary journal dedicated to the dissemination of new knowledge in all sciences relevant to dentistry and the oral cavity and associated structures in health and disease.
    About the International Association for Dental Research
    The International Association for Dental Research (IADR) is a nonprofit organization with more than 12,000 individual members worldwide, dedicated to: (1) advancing research and increasing knowledge to improve oral health, (2) supporting the oral health research community, and (3) facilitating the communication and application of research findings for the improvement of oral health worldwide. To learn more, visit www.iadr.org. The American Association for Dental Research (AADR) is the largest Division of IADR, with nearly 4,000 members in the United States. To learn more, visit www.aadronline.com.
    ###

  • The Research Agenda on Oral Health Inequalities: The IADR-GOHIRA Initiative
    Williams D.M.
    Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
    email Corresponding Author


    Abstract
    FullText
    PDF
    References

    S. Karger AG

    Go to Top
    Abstract

    Recommend this
    FullText PDF
    Abstract

    The World Health Organization asserts that oral health is a basic human right, yet this is a right enjoyed by few. Oral disease is a major problem in high-income countries, where the cost of treating oral diseases often exceeds that for major non-communicable diseases. In low-to-middle income countries, oral diseases are a severe and growing public health problem. Furthermore, major inequalities exist both within and between countries in terms of disease severity and prevalence, and major social gradients exist in the prevalence of oral disease. The International Association for Dental Research (IADR) has responded to the challenge of poor oral health and oral health inequalities through the Global Oral Health Inequalities: the Research Agenda (GOHIRA) initiative. In a Call to Action it has set out the priorities for research that can lead to a reduction in oral health inequalities. Three key challenges have been identified, namely gaps in knowledge and an insufficient focus on social policy, the separation of oral health from general health, and inadequate evidence-based data. Ten key research priorities have been identified with due regard to the differing needs of the variety of global health care systems, and a set of prioritized outcomes and a timeline for implementation have been defined. In the wider context of the proposals set out above, five immediate priorities for action have been proposed.

    © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
    Keywords

    Common risk factors Health inequalities Health promotion Non-communicable disease Prevention Social determinants of health
    Introduction

    The World Health Organization (WHO) asserts that oral health is a basic human right, yet this is a right enjoyed by few. Oral disease is a major problem in high-income countries where the cost of treating oral diseases often exceeds that for major non-communicable diseases. In low-to-middle income countries, oral diseases are a severe and growing public health problem. Furthermore, major inequalities exist both within and between countries in terms of disease severity and prevalence, and major social gradients exist in the prevalence of oral disease. Thus, the lower a person's social position, the worse their risks and health. The poor and disadvantaged have higher risks of disease and worse health.

    The International Association for Dental Research (IADR) has responded to the challenge of poor oral health and oral health inequalities through the Global Oral Health Inequalities: the Research Agenda (GOHIRA) initiative and has set out the priorities for research that can lead to a reduction in inequalities in oral health within and between countries. It will tackle the social determinants of oral health and thereby improve global oral health and reduce inequalities. This approach has the potential to bring significant, real health benefits to the world's population. It is amazing that decisions about health care, including oral health care, are still being made without a solid research evidence base [1]. It is this deficiency that IADR-GOHIRA is determined to address. This paper gives an account of the IADR-GOHIRA initiative and sets out the ten key priorities for action that have been identified. It also proposes immediate priorities for action for the IADR Africa and Middle East Region.
    The Global Burden of Oral Disease

    Oral disease constitutes a major health burden on a global scale, and this is attributable principally to dental caries, periodontal disease, infections, oral cancer and craniofacial developmental abnormalities, particularly cleft lip and palate. Dental caries is one of the commonest chronic diseases [2]. An epidemic of dental diseases is affecting some population groups. The US Surgeon General has stated that this burden of disease restricts activities in schools, work and home, and often significantly diminishes the quality of life [3]. Over 50 million school hours a year are lost because of dental-related disease in the USA, with children from low-income families 12 times more likely to miss days at school than those from higher income families [4]. The effects of caries are even more marked in low- and middle-income countries, where ineffective prevention and limited access to dental treatment mean that much of the demand for care remains unmet.

    Periodontal disease is a significant public health problem among adults. A recent important study in the USA has presented data showing that periodontal disease is much more prevalent than had previously been assumed. Eke et al. [5] estimated that the prevalence among adults aged over 30 years in the USA reaches 47%, with 64% of adults over 65 years having moderate-to-severe periodontal disease. Good prevalence data are lacking for low- and middle-income countries, but it is reasonable to assume that figures will be at least as high as these results from the USA because oral hygiene level in general is poor in developing countries.

    Oral cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide and the commonest cancer among men in Southeast Asia [6]. Tobacco, especially with alcohol, is a major risk factor for oral cancer, as well as for cancers of other body sites.

    Not only do dental diseases cause considerable suffering, but also the global cost of dental care is enormous [7]. The provision of dental care in industrialized countries accounts for between 3% and 12.5% of health expenditure, which puts dental care among the top four or five expenditure areas. Even low-income countries like Sri Lanka spend 3.5% of their health budget on public dental care services [7]. It is disturbing that in spite of this major investment in dental care, oral disease still remains such a major problem on a global scale and it is important to understand why this is the case.
    The Continuing Problem of Oral Disease

    Major improvements in oral health have been achieved in most high-income countries in recent years but, despite these improvements in population oral health, marked oral health inequalities persist and this mirrors the situation with wider general health [8]. This can largely be attributed to a collective failure to implement effectively what is known about prevention, coupled with a failure to understand the importance of the social determinants of health and too much reliance on dental health education directed at people adopting healthier lifestyles and avoiding unhealthy ones. The World Dental Federation - FDI Vision 2020 states: ‘historically, the approach to oral health has … overwhelmingly focused on treatment, more than on disease prevention and oral health promotion. This approach … has limitations.' [9]. Instead of focusing on the prevention of avoidable disease and tackling the causes of dental disease, there has been a disproportionate reliance on the use of interventionist approaches. A system focused primarily on treatment of disease is not effective in controlling chronic diseases, is not economically sustainable, and is not ethically responsible.

    A radical reorientation in our thinking is needed if we are to achieve sustainable improvements in oral health and a reduction in the inequalities in oral health that have been described above. It is time to start thinking about oral health in the same way that the medical profession is viewing general health. The focus of oral health care systems on treatment rather than health promotion in industrialized countries is very similar to the way our medical colleagues have tried in the past to deal with the major non-communicable diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, diabetes, heart disease and stroke. If we are to meet the challenge of the global burden of oral disease and inequality in health, then we need to start thinking about them in the same way that the wider health community is dealing with non-communicable disease, rather than focusing on individual diseases in isolation.
    Social Determinants of Health

    Social determinants of health are the circumstances in which people are born, grow, live, work and age [10], and the life chances of people differ greatly depending on where they are born and raised. The Commission on the Social Determinants of Health [11] stated that the poorest people have the highest levels of illness and premature mortality, but that poor health is not confined to those who are worst off. At all levels of income, health and illness follow a social gradient: the lower the socioeconomic position, the worse the health. Marmot et al. [10] have further asserted that the social gradient of health in individual countries and the major inequalities between countries are caused by the unequal distribution of power, income, goods and services, globally and nationally. These structural determinants and conditions of daily life constitute the social determinants of health. The consequence of such findings is that if major reductions in health inequality are to be achieved, the structural determinants of health need to be addressed. This has profound implications for approaches to the non-communicable diseases that are the major global health challenge of the 21st century.

    There is good evidence that major reductions in caries and periodontal disease in high-income countries have resulted from the wide availability of fluoridated toothpaste and changes in behaviours and social change. Furthermore, there has been considerable progress in the prevention of chronic diseases - including oral diseases - using the common risk factor approach [12], which addresses risks including bad diet, tobacco use, excessive alcohol consumption, lack of exercise and lack of control. So it is reasonable to ask ‘what evidence is there that oral diseases follow a social gradient, in common with the other non-communicable diseases, and how good is the evidence that the social determinants of oral health play a role in the causation of oral disease?' The answers have profound implications for our approach to improve oral health for all at a global level.

    It has long been recognized that the poorest oral health is found among the socially disadvantaged [13]. However, there is now strong evidence to show that the major oral diseases are socially patterned, sharing the same social determinants as the major non-communicable diseases, and that there is a gradient of risk for oral diseases across all socioeconomic groups. Watt and Sheiham [12] have stated that ‘oral diseases, as is the case with other health outcomes, are socially patterned across the entire social hierarchy.'
    Oral Health Inequality: Shifting the Paradigm

    Watt [14] has argued cogently that if we are to address the challenge of poor oral health based on the evidence we now possess, we need a paradigm shift away from the current predominant biomedical and behavioural ‘downstream' approach to oral health towards one that addresses the underlying social determinants of oral health, using a combination of complementary public health strategies. Watt is particularly critical of approaches to health education based on lifestyle interventions that fail to appreciate the fundamental underlying importance of social determinants, showing not only that the results of such approaches are disappointing, but also that they actually increase health inequalities. He argues strongly for the adoption of ‘upstream' integrated interventions that address the determinants of health and emphasize the importance of promoting and maintaining good oral and general health. Such an approach calls for oral health programmes to be integrated into other health interventions using a common risk factor approach [12].

    Reducing the burden of non-communicable disease is now recognized as one of the great challenges facing society on a global scale. The Political Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the United Nations (UN) General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases in September 2011 acknowledged that the growing global burden of non-communicable diseases constitutes one of the major challenges for development in the 21st century, undermining social and economic development throughout the world and threatening the achievement of internationally agreed development goals [15]. In one of the most important statements made about the burden of oral disease, the declaration also recognized ‘that renal, oral and eye diseases pose a major health burden for many countries and that these diseases share common risk factors and can benefit from common responses to non-communicable diseases.' The UN declaration presents both a challenge and an opportunity for the oral health community to take action to reduce the burden of oral disease and reduce inequalities. The challenge is formidable and we are not likely to deal with it effectively in isolation. However, the UN has offered recommendations for a way forward and we should seize the opportunity.

    It is acknowledged that social injustice is killing people on a large scale and that it is imperative that public health efforts to reduce health inequalities are redoubled. However, it has been argued that if these are to be more effective, then a more sophisticated understanding of the barriers to progress will be needed. It is now equally clear that social injustice will also need to be addressed if we are to meet the growing challenges of poor oral health and inequalities. The time is now right to develop a new model for oral health care that considers oral health as an integral part of general health, addresses the needs and demands of populations, and includes an integrated public health approach to tackle the social determinants of chronic diseases.
    The IADR-GOHIRA Initiative
    Assembling the Evidence

    The mission of the IADR is to advance research and increase knowledge for the improvement of oral health worldwide, support and represent the oral health research community, and facilitate the communication and application of research findings. A few years ago, the IADR accepted a practical policy to reduce inequalities in its own membership dues. The dues were reduced for the members in low- and middle-income countries and increased for members from high-income countries as estimated by the World Bank (fig. 1). Building on its basic mission and the core value of health as a human right, the GOHIRA initiative is intended to refine and refocus the research directions for the immediate future: to set priorities. IADR-GOHIRA has four main aims:

    Fig. 1

    The current IADR membership dues according to 5 regions of the IADR. The distribution of countries by World Bank Classification in each of the 5 IADR regions, with the dues shown for each World Bank Classification category at 2013 levels. In the Africa and Middle East Region there is a preponderance of countries having economies in the lower middle income or lower category, in marked contrast to the other 4 IADR regions.
    http://www.karger.com/WebMaterial/ShowPic/148884

    • To better understand the full range of oral health determinants that include biological and environmental factors as well as behavioural and social determinants of health and well-being

    • To promote research of social and physical environments, across the social gradient, with emphasis on marginalized and vulnerable communities

    • To focus on research strategies that can better serve to reduce existing health inequalities, including oral health inequalities within and among countries

    • To develop and maintain usable resources for compiling evidence-based systematic reviews and guidelines on methods and strategies to address the inequalities in oral health

    The GOHIRA initiative was established in May 2009 at the direction of and resourced by the IADR Board, under the leadership of Past President David Williams [16]. As a first step, a series of task groups with appointed leaders were convened as follows:

    • Dental Caries Task Group, Nigel Pitts [2]

    • Periodontal Disease Task Group, Li Jian Jin [17]

    • Oral Cancer Task Group, Newell Johnson [6]

    • Oral Infections Task Group, Stephen Challacombe [18]

    • Development Abnormalities Task Group, Peter Mossey [19]

    • Implementation and Delivery Task Group, Aubrey Sheiham [20]

    The task group leaders were responsible for assembling the members of their respective groups from the wider international research community. This initiative was undertaken with the participation of the WHO and the World Dental Federation (FDI).
    Overall Remit of Task Group

    Each task group was charged with identifying:

    • Global variations in diseases and their presentations, taking into account variations within as well as between countries

    • Likely reasons to account for this variation

    • Reasons for the failure to implement at scale measures that have been shown to be effective in clinical or laboratory studies

    • Priorities for both basic and applied research

    • A 5-year research agenda that would lead to key improvements in global oral health, with particular reference to inequalities between and within countries. This agenda would have defined, expected outcomes and milestones by which progress could be measured

    In addition to the foregoing, each task group was charged with considering:

    • Health inequalities in low-to-middle income countries

    • Health inequalities in high-income countries

    • Strategies to close the implementation gap in prevention - primary, secondary and tertiary - and treatment, by translating research findings into policy and practice

    • How best to promote consistency in terminology and knowledge across the domains of research, practice, epidemiology, public health and education. This should be pursued in collaboration with other organizations where appropriate

    • Addressing inequalities at a regional, country and local level and improving the methodology by which these can be recognized and monitored

    • Imaginative steps, built on implementation science, to get research findings into practice, policy and health systems

    • How best to complement and facilitate the work of the Implementation and Delivery Task Group

    These tasks were to be achieved by working with the wider research and oral health communities across appropriate international organizations. The task groups were also asked to determine how best to grasp opportunitiesand counterthreatsto advance the issues outlined above.
    Principal Points to Be Addressed by All IADR Global Challenge Task Groups

    It was a fundamental requirement that the reports from the Task Groups should be concise. In order to ensure that the evidence gathered was systematic and capable of being analysed across task groups, each was asked to consider:

    • An analysis of the current state of the evidence; consideration was to be given to the inclusion of, or reference to, systematic reviews

    • Emphasis on the end stage of translational research, with identification of the priorities for implementation; this process was to be conducted with the engagement of the basic science community, in order to feed into the wider research and innovations agenda; the process would take into account the variation in needs and demands, both within and between countries

    • An early focus on identifying what is already known and an emphasis on delivering current research into implementation and delivery

    • Evaluation of existing guidelines or development of new guidelines if appropriate, together with a need for standardisation, so that the effectiveness of interventions globally could be compared and evaluated

    The expert position papers produced by the task groups were presented in a symposium at the IADR General Assembly in Barcelona, Spain in 2010 and published in 2011 in a special issue of Advances in Dental Research [16,21].
    IADR Board Workshop

    Drawing on the expert position papers produced by the IADR-GOHIRA Task Groups and published in Advances in Dental Research, an IADR Board Workshop was held in the USA in May 2011 with the following objectives:

    • To formulate priorities for research and a coherent research agenda to reduce inequalities in oral health within and between countries and close the gap between research and the practical implementation of research findings

    • To build on the evidence and take action, using the principles of knowledge translation and exchange; this entails the exchange, synthesis and ethically sound application of research findings within a complex system of relationships among researchers and knowledge users - the incorporation of research knowledge into policies and practice - thus translating knowledge into improved health of the population

    • To develop strategies for integrating oral health research with research in other fields on the social determinants of general health and inequalities in health

    • To develop a clear agreed plan to achieve the realization of the IADR-GOHIRA research agenda

    • To develop frameworks to enable the global oral health research community to place research on social determinants of health and reducing inequalities in oral health high on their agendas

    • To advocate to research funders that they should support research not only on the determinants of general health, including oral health, but also on their inter-relationships, thus enhancing the understanding of inequalities in health and strategies to reduce them efficiently and effectively
    IADR-GOHIRA: A Call to Action

    The IADR Board has published the IADR-GOHIRA Call to Action [22], which sets out the principal research priorities that have been identified and a timescale over which progress is to be achieved. The section below is based on this Call to Action.
    The IADR-GOHIRA Research Priorities

    Three key challenges have been identified:

    • Gaps in knowledge and specifically insufficient focus on social policy

    • The separation of oral health from general health

    • Inadequate evidence-based data (including research driven programmes, capacity-building strategies, standardized systems for measuring and monitoring, etc.)

    Ten key research objectives have been prioritized to address these challenges, with due regard to the differing needs of the variety of global health care systems:

    • Identify critical gaps in knowledge

    • Develop and implement, in partnership with cognate evidence-based medicine and dentistry organizations, a knowledge base that uses a standard set of reporting criteria and includes a registry of implementation trials

    • Emphasize the significance of psychosocial determinants of oral health - oral health-related behaviour and oral health-care seeking behaviour - on whole populations and underprivileged communities

    • Emphasize the importance of integrating research on oral health inequalities, with wider approaches to reducing health inequality as a whole

    • Emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary and translational research, seeking input from a range of social scientists and health professionals

    • Develop disease prevention strategies based on broad social and environmental determinants of health, adopting upstream rather than downstream strategies [20]

    • Develop strategies that are capable of local interpretation in a way that respects cultural sensitivities and socioeconomic constraints for improving oral health literacy

    • Develop community-based, regional and country level systems for oral health promotion and health care, recognizing previous experience and resource implications and, where appropriate, emphasizing whole and at-risk populations [23,24]

    • Raise the issue of oral health inequalities, with the need to promote proportionate universalism and specific emphasis on underprivileged communities, in wider public debates

    • Advocate for the inclusion of oral health with other sectors in all policies, in line with the Adelaide Statement of Health in All Policies [25]
    Outcome Priorities and Timeline

    The prioritized outcomes and timeline for implementation of the IADR-GOHIRA Call to Action are to:

    • Establish and set in motion by 2013 the Global Oral Health Inequalities Research Network (GOHIRN); this network should create a community of interest within IADR to facilitate the communication, wide dissemination and implementation of IADR-GOHIRA research priorities; GOHIRN was established at the 2012 IADR General Session at Iguacu Falls; it has also initiated symposia and oral and poster sessions at IADR meetings throughout 2012-2013

    • Engage with key partners, in particular WHO and FDI, to agree on an integrated approach to the reduction of oral health inequalities [26]; after approval of the IADR Board, a joint workshop by 2014 is proposed, wherein specific measurable outcomes and timelines will be defined

    • Engage in 2013 with the main research funding agencies and oral health policy makers to raise awareness and increase the political priority of global oral health research to reduce inequalities, with the goal of locating funding resources and sustainable enabling infrastructure for achieving the IADR-GOHIRA goals

    • Adopt the common risk approach by 2013 and build links across general health disciplines, including child health and primary care, so as to learn from others' experiences, cross-fertilize ideas and approaches, develop lateral support, maximize lobbying capacity and address common issues

    • Encourage research on health promotion by 2013 aimed at improving existing dental health policies for children and young adults, with a strong emphasis on an integrated approach to the upstream approach of disease prevention and oral health promotion

    • Monitor, evaluate and conduct a comprehensive outcome assessment for the IADR-GOHIRA initiative by 2016

    • Attain, by utilizing IADR leadership and collaborative world research efforts, the social and moral goal of decreasing, and even eliminating, the global disparities and inequalities of oral diseases, within one generation (by 2030)
    Immediate Africa and Middle East Region Priorities: Five Practical Things to Do Now

    In the wider context of the proposals set out above, it is reasonable to ask what the immediate GOHIRA priorities are for the Africa and Middle East Region of the IADR. As a starting point to stimulate further dialogue on the subject throughout the Africa and Middle East Region constituency, the following are respectfully proposed:

    • Identify key knowledge gaps and target priority areas

    • Implement what we know to be effective

    • Integrate oral health messages into all health promotion strategies

    • Recognize the importance of partnership across disciplines

    • Recognize the role of civil society and the importance of working with our communities
    Conclusion

    The importance of oral disease as a major global health and economic problem has been discussed. Attention has been drawn to the fact that major inequalities exist both within and between countries in terms of disease severity and prevalence, and that major social gradients exist in the prevalence of oral disease. In light of these insights there is a need to develop a new paradigm based on an understanding of the social determinants of health and the integration of oral disease prevention strategies into general strategies for disease prevention and health promotion. The research agenda that this necessitates is set out, with an explicit action plan. In addition, five immediate priorities focusing on the needs and oral health demands of the Africa and Middle East Region of the IADR have been proposed.
    Disclosure Statement

    The author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
    References

    Pang T, Terry RF (eds): WHO/PLoS Collection ‘No Health Without Research': a call for papers. PLoS Med 2011;8:1-2.
    External Resources
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Pitts N, Amaechi B, Niederman R, Acevedo A-M, et al: Global oral health inequalities: dental caries task group - research agenda. Adv Dent Res 2011.;23:211-220.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    US Department of Health and Human Services: Oral health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 2000.
    Adams PF, Marano MA: Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey 1994. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 1995;10:193.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, et al, on behalf of the participating members of the CDC Periodontal Disease Surveillance Workgroup: Prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the United States: 2009 and 2010. J Dent Res 2012;10:914-920.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Johnson NW, Warnakulasuriya S, Gupta PC, et al: Global inequalities in incidence and outcomes for oral cancer: causes and solutions. Adv Dent Res 2011;23:237-246.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Beaglehole R, Benzian H, Crail J, et al: The Oral Health Atlas. Mapping a Neglected Global Health Issue. Brighton, FDI World Dental Federation, 2009.
    Watt RG: Strategies and approaches in oral disease prevention and health promotion. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:711-718.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    Glick M, Monteiro da Silva O, Seeberger GK et al: FDI Vision 2020: shaping the future of oral health. Int Dent J 2012;62:278-291.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, et al, on behalf of Commission on Social Determinants of Health: Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet 2008;372:1661-1669.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Commission on Social Determinants of Health: Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. World Health Organization, 2008.
    Watt RG, Sheiham AS: Integrating the common risk factor approach into a social determinants framework. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012;40:289-296.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Locker D: Deprivation and oral health: a review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28:161-169.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Watt RG: From victim blaming to upstream action: tackling the social determinants of oral health inequalities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35:1-11.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    United Nations General Assembly: Sixty-sixth session: agenda item 117. Political declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases A/66/L.1, 2011.
    Williams DM: Global oral health inequalities: the research agenda. Adv Dent Res 2011;23:198-200.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Jin LJ, Armitage GC, Klinge B, et al: Global oral health inequalities: task group - periodontal disease. Adv Dent Res 2011;23:221-226.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Challacombe SJ, Chidzonga M, Glick M, et al: Global oral health inequalities: oral infections - challenges and approaches. Adv Dent Res 2011;23:227-236.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Mossey PA, Shaw WC, Munger RG, et al: Global oral health inequalities: challenges in the prevention and management of orofacial clefts and potential solutions. Adv Dent Res 2011;23:247-256.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Sheiham A, Alexander D, Cohen L, et al: Global oral health inequalities: task group - implementation and delivery of oral health strategies. Adv Dent Res 2011;23:259-267.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Williams DM: Global oral health inequalities: the research agenda. J Dent Res 2011;90:549-551.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Sgan-Cohen HD, Evans W, Whelton H, et al: IADR Global Oral Health Inequalities Research Agenda (IADR-GOHIRA®): a call to action. J Dent Res 2013;92:209-211.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Dugdill L, Pine CM: Evaluation of international case studies within ‘Live. Learn. Laugh.': a unique global public-private partnership to promote oral health. Int Dent J 2011;61(suppl 2):22-29.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    CrossRef (DOI)
    Monse B, Naliponguit E, Belizario V, et al: Essential health care package for children - the ‘Fit for School' program in the Philippines. Int Dent J 2010;60:85-93.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)
    World Health Organization: Adelaide Statement on Health in All Policies. Adelaide, WHO, Government of South Australia, 2010.
    Petersen PE: Improvement of global oral health - the leadership role of the World Health Organization. Community Dent Health 2010;27:194-199.
    External Resources
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM)

    Author Contacts

    Prof. David M. Williams, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCPath, FDS, RCS (Engl)

    Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry

    Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AD (UK)

    E-Mail d.m.williams@qmul.ac.uk
    Article / Publication Details
    First-Page Preview
    Abstract of Review

    Received: January 29, 2013
    Accepted: October 31, 2013
    Published online: January 07, 2014
    Issue release date: April 2014

    Number of Print Pages: 8
    Number of Figures: 1
    Number of Tables: 0

    ISSN: 1011-7571 (Print)
    eISSN: 1423-0151 (Online)

    For additional information: http://www.karger.com/MPP
    Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

    Open Access License: This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
    Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
    Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

  • Thema von carlos im Forum IADR International Ass...

    Med Princ Pract. 2014;23 Suppl 1:52-9. doi: 10.1159/000356934. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
    The research agenda on oral health inequalities: the IADR-GOHIRA initiative.
    Williams DM1.
    Author information
    Abstract

    The World Health Organization asserts that oral health is a basic human right, yet this is a right enjoyed by few. Oral disease is a major problem in high-income countries, where the cost of treating oral diseases often exceeds that for major non-communicable diseases. In low-to-middle income countries, oral diseases are a severe and growing public health problem. Furthermore, major inequalities exist both within and between countries in terms of disease severity and prevalence, and major social gradients exist in the prevalence of oral disease. The International Association for Dental Research (IADR) has responded to the challenge of poor oral health and oral health inequalities through the Global Oral Health Inequalities: the Research Agenda (GOHIRA) initiative. In a Call to Action it has set out the priorities for research that can lead to a reduction in oral health inequalities. Three key challenges have been identified, namely gaps in knowledge and an insufficient focus on social policy, the separation of oral health from general health, and inadequate evidence-based data. Ten key research priorities have been identified with due regard to the differing needs of the variety of global health care systems, and a set of prioritized outcomes and a timeline for implementation have been defined. In the wider context of the proposals set out above, five immediate priorities for action have been proposed.

  • Emergeny Dentist HandbookDatum23.10.2016 13:06
    Thema von carlos im Forum Books - libres - Bücher

    http://www.medicalbooksepub.com/2015/08/...k-epub.html?m=0


    “Each case is clearly bestowed with Associate in Nursing initial case story together with numerous examinations and histories, clearly outlined learning goals and objectives, self-study queries, and a part referred to as net points – intensive answers to potential questions about the subject.” (BDA News, one Gregorian calendar month 2012)

    Product Description
    Wiley-Blackwell's "Clinical Cases" series is intended to acknowledge the spatial relation of clinical cases to the profession by providing actual cases with an educational backbone. Clinical Cases in dental medicine describes the core principles of dental medicine and demonstrates their sensible, every-day application through a variety of representative cases building from the easy to the advanced and from the common to the rare. This distinctive approach supports the new trend in case-based and problem-based learning, totally covering topics starting from kid oral health to advanced pulp medical care. extremely illustrated fully color, Clinical Cases in dental medicine utilizes a format that fosters freelance learning and prepares the reader for case-based examinations.

    The book presents actual clinical cases, in the midst of educational comment, that question and educate the reader regarding essential topics in dental medicine. The book begins with a collection of cases illustrating the foremost common diagnoses and therefore the key selections and evaluations leading up to them. resulting chapters continue during this vogue, presenting exemplary cases because the basis of discussing numerous treatment choices together with surgical and non-surgical treatment, regenerative medical care, mucogingival medical care, and knowledge base treatments. closing chapters cowl implant website development and general interference of such dental medicine diseases.

    Clinical Cases in Periodontics's case-based format is especially helpful for pre-doctoral dental students, post-graduate residents and practitioners, each as a textbook from that to find out regarding the difficult and riveting nature of periodontology, and additionally as a reference tool to assist with treatment coming up with once advanced cases gift within the dental workplace.

  • Thema von carlos im Forum Haiti

    Eine riesige Welle hätten wir nicht überlebt"



    Die Berliner Zahnärztin Daniela Göhlich wollte helfen, daher ist sie im September mit der Hilfsorganisation "dentists and friends" nach Haiti mitgeflogen, um zwei Wochen lang Menschen im Süden des Landes, in einem Dorf nordwestlich von Port Salut, von ihren Zahnschmerzen zu befreien. Die Morgenpost berichtete im Sommer über ihren Einsatz. Sie flog in eine Region, in der es überhaupt keinen Zahnarzt gibt.

    Wer Schmerzen hat, muss sie ertragen oder zu einem sogenannten Zahnbrecher gehen. Eine Woche lang arbeitete die 43-Jährige mit ihrem Team von morgens bis in die Dunkelheit hinein. Doch dann kam Hurrikan Matthew, der in Haiti bislang mehr als 500 Todesopfer gefordert hat. Port Salut lag im Zentrum des Wirbelsturms, die Berlinerin hat die Katastrophe hautnah miterlebt. Inzwischen ist sie wieder zurück und erzählt:

    "Erste Warnungen gab es schon Ende September. Aber niemand wusste etwas Genaues, Nachrichten gibt es dort kaum und die Menschen kennen ja Wirbelstürme, das ist erst einmal gar nicht so besonders. Sie haben mehr eingekauft und ihre Häuser, soweit es geht, gesichert, aber das war es. Mir war mulmig, ich habe versucht, Informationen aus den USA zu bekommen, aber der Internetzugang ist in Haiti nicht sehr stabil.
    Stärke vier bedeutet eine Windgeschwindigkeit von 220 km/h

    Was ich dennoch erfuhr, war beängstigend. Matthew war mit der Stärke vier angekündigt, stärker als vor vier Jahren bei Sandy, da war es 'nur' drei. Vier bedeutet eine Windgeschwindigkeit von 220 km/h. Das fegt alles weg. Der Kern des Hurrikan war auf den US-Vorschauen dunkellila eingefärbt und der Süden Haitis lag genau in diesem Feld. Für Sonntag, 2. Oktober, war Matthew angekündigt.

    Schon Tage zuvor wurde der Wind immer stärker, Wolken brauten sich am Himmel zusammen. Auf dem Meer bildeten sich meterhohe Wellen. Für Montag und Dienstag wurde die Schule, in der unser Behandlungsraum war, vorsorglich geschlossen, wir konnten nicht mehr arbeiten. Aber der Hurrikan kam nicht, auch wenn der Wind weiter zunahm und es nur noch regnete. Dieses Warten, diese Ungewissheit waren unerträglich.

    Um zwei Uhr in der Nacht zu Dienstag gab es plötzlich einen furchtbaren Lärm, die Fensterscheiben zerbrachen, ich hatte einen wahnsinnigen Druck auf den Ohren, wie im Flugzeug, wenn es plötzlich an Höhe verliert. Matthew war da. Dann schrie auch schon die Frau, bei der wir wohnten, von unten, wir sollten sofort runterkommen. Wir saßen alle zusammen in der Küche, die hatte kein Fenster und keine Tür nach draußen.
    Häuser waren zusammengebrochen oder vom Meer verschluckt

    Um uns toste es, aber wir konnten nicht nach draußen schauen, es war total unheimlich. Gegen Morgen schauten wir doch raus: Es war ein Bild der Verwüstung. Häuser, die nicht wie unseres aus Beton waren, waren zusammengebrochen oder vom Meer verschluckt, riesige Palmen waren umgekippt. Und das Meer war ganz dicht, riesige Wellen schlugen hinter der Straße hoch. Vor dem Wasser hatte ich am meisten Angst, denn eine riesige Welle hätte auch unser Haus einfach mitreißen können. Das hätte niemand von uns überlebt.

    Gegen Morgen kamen immer mehr Menschen zu uns, die kein Dach mehr über dem Kopf hatten, vor allem Kinder wurden hereingereicht. 15 oder noch mehr Menschen saßen in der kleinen Küche. Wir hörten auch von den ersten Toten in der direkten Nachbarschaft. Erst nach 24 Stunden ließ der Sturm nach. Stundenlang haben wir dann das Wasser aus dem Haus geschippt. Es war ja eines der wenigen Häuser, die noch standen, wir mussten es irgendwie trocken halten. Ich musste meiner Familie Bescheid geben, aber wie?

    Internet und Telefonnetz gab es längst nicht mehr, und die Straße war voller Schutt und Bäume. Ich dachte: Hier komme ich nie weg. Irgendwer sagte dann, beim Krankenhaus, fünf Kilometer entfernt, würde das Mobilfunknetz noch funktionieren. Wir sind zu Fuß dahin. Vorbei an den Verwüstungen, vorbei an verzweifelten Menschen, die versuchten, noch irgendetwas in ihren zerstörten Häusern zu retten. Ich konnte dann wenigstens meinem Mann und meinen Kindern eine SMS schreiben, 30 Stunden lang waren sie im Ungewissen, ob ich überhaupt noch lebe. Danach sind wir noch in die Schule gegangen. Das Dach über unserem Behandlungsraum war weggerissen, alle Materialien durchnässt und nicht mehr zu gebrauchen, zum Glück war aber der Bohrer noch unversehrt. Arbeiten konnten wir aber nicht mehr.
    Brücken waren weggerissen, Straßen unterbrochen

    Am Donnerstag kamen zwei Frauen mit einem Bulldozer und räumten die Straße einigermaßen frei. Trotzdem wussten wir erst nicht, wie wir wegkommen könnten, denn überall waren Brücken weggerissen, die Straße unterbrochen, teilweise ging es nur zu Fuß weiter, aber das ging ja nicht mit unseren Geräten. Es hieß, im 30 Kilometer entfernten Les Cayes würden noch Busse Richtung Port-au-Prince fahren. Aber wie sollten wir dahinkommen?

    Irgendwer hat dann einen Pick-up organisiert. Die Fahrt war ein Abenteuer. Für die 250 Kilometer nach Port-au-Prince brauchten wir statt vier mehr als zehn Stunden. In Les Cayes haben wir tatsächlich einen Bus bekommen. Aber unsere Fahrt war schon bald unterbrochen, wieder war eine Brücke weggerissen. Es ging nur mit Mopeds weiter, doch die Leute, die uns ans andere Ufer bringen wollten, verlangten immer mehr Geld. Es kam zu Rangeleien, irgendwer riss auch an mir herum, furchtbar. Am Montag ging es dann endlich nach Hause."

  • Thema von carlos im Forum Haiti

    Wieder Haiti
    Gewaltiger Hurrikan „Matthew“ fegt über gebeuteltes Land hinweg

    Während diese Zeilen entstehen fegt ein furchterregender Hurrikan mit Windgeschwindigkeiten von bis zu 250 Stundenkilometern über die Karibik hinweg. In Kuba laufen Evakuationen und Vorbereitungen ebenso intensiv, wie in mehreren amerikanischen Bundesstaaten. Jamaika wurde beim Landgang des gewaltigen Tropensturms bereits hart getroffen, ebenso Haiti. In das in den vergangenen Jahren gebeutelte, bis heute ärmste Land der westlichen Hemisphäre, hat humedica sofort ein vielfältig einsetzbares Erkundungsteam geschickt.

    Erste Fotos die humedica aus Haiti erreichen, lassen das Ausmaß der Naturkatastrophe erahnen. Foto: Privat

    Selbst die frühen Statistiken nach dem Wirbelsturm lassen schlimmste Konsequenzen befürchten: Bestätigt wurden von offizieller Seite neun Todesopfer in Haiti, die Zahl der Verletzen ist noch nicht abschätzbar, mehr als fünf Millionen Menschen sind direkt vom Sturm betroffen, Notunterkünfte wurden für etwa 340.000 Menschen eingerichtet. Auch sechs Jahre nach dem Jahrhundertbeben ist Haiti an vielen Fronten beschäftigt mit Wiederaufbau, politischer Stabilisierung, einer wirtschaftlichen Aufholjagd. Das Land bleibt auf der Suche nach Normalität und Alltag.

    Weil die Einweihung eines Wiederaufbauprojektes anstand, reiste humedica-Geschäftsführer Wolfgang Groß einige Tage bevor der Hurrikan „Matthew“ Haiti erreichte auf die Insel Hispanola, erlebte so diese Naturkatastrophe hautnah mit; sein von großem Respekt geprägtes Fazit per elektronischer Nachricht: „Ich habe in 37 Jahren der Arbeit für humedica schon viele Katastrophen hautnah miterlebt, aber nichts Vergleichbares wie diesen Hurrikan!“
    Immer wieder Haiti

    Viele Katastrophen

    Es war sehr schnell klar, dass Haiti erneut Hilfe benötigen würde und so entschloss sich humedica umgehend, ein Erkundungsteam mit vielfältigen, auch medizinischen Einsatzmöglichkeiten in die Karibik zu entsenden. Neben dem durch viele Missionen erfahrenen Arzt Dr. Markus Hohlweck (Bonn) und der Rettungsassistentin Anja Ziegler aus dem fränkischen Kulmbach, handelt es sich dabei um die Koordinatoren Anna Felfeli (München), Dr. Steffi Gentner (Konstanz) und Oleg Lepschin aus der deutschen Hauptstadt Berlin. Pflegekraft Daniel Warkentin (Rengsdorf) vervollständigt das Team, das sich bereits auf den Weg gemacht hatte, als „Matthew“ noch immer in der Region wütete.

    Hurrikan "Matthew" bleibt weiterhin gefährlich und macht sich nach Haiti auf den Weg in Richtung Florida. Quelle: Mohri Maps

    Es ist damit zu rechnen, dass neben der üblichen basismedizinischen Versorgung der betroffenen Bevölkerung insbesondere Hilfsgüterverteilungen und zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt auch Wiederaufbaumaßnahmen umgesetzt werden müssen.
    Kaum mediale Resonanz

    Bitte helfen Sie uns heute!

    Es ist ein Phänomen, das wir leider immer wieder erleben: Obwohl das Ausmaß dieses Hurrikans in einer von struktureller Armut und regelmäßigen Naturkatastrophen gebeutelten Region gewaltig ist, liegt der Fokus der Weltöffentlichkeit nicht auf Haiti. Entsprechend ist auch die mediale Resonanz unterdurchschnittlich. Daher möchten wir Sie sehr freundlich um eine gezielte, großzügige Spende zugunsten dieses Einsatzes bitten.

    Bitte stehen Sie an der Seite des Teams, mit Ihrer Unterstützung aber insbesondere an der Seite der Menschen, die unverschuldet in diese schwierige Situation geraten sind. Lassen Sie uns gemeinsam einmal mehr Hoffnung und nachhaltige Hilfe in dieses Land bringen, das uns so sehr braucht. Vielen herzlichen Dank! Bitte verfolgen Sie die Aktivitäten unseres Teams auch über die sozialen Medien Facebook, Twitter und Youtube, sowie über unsere Internetseite www.humedica.org. Danke.

  • Thema von carlos im Forum ***news***news***news*...

    Nach Wirbelsturm Matthew in Haiti: 350.000 Menschen brauchen Hilfe

    CARE-Helfer im Süden verteilen Nahrung und Wasser / Berichte über steigende Cholerafälle



    Bonn/Port-au-Prince, 6.10.2016. Während das gesamte Ausmaß der Zerstörung noch erhoben wird, startet die Hilfsorganisation CARE Nothilfe in Haiti. Nach Angaben der Vereinten Nationen sind rund 350.000 Menschen von den Folgen des Wirbelsturms Matthew betroffen.



    „Jérémie, die Hauptstadt der Region Grande Anse, ist stark zerstört. Alle Telefonverbindungen und die Stromversorgung sind zusammengebrochen“, berichtet CARE-Länderdirektor Jean-Michel Vigreux aus Haiti. 80 Prozent der Häuser liegen in Trümmern. Die einzige Verbindungsstraße ist unpassierbar und den Menschen gehen langsam Nahrung und Geld aus.“



    CARE hatte bereits in Vorbereitung auf den Sturm Lebensmittel und sauberes Wasser an 3.700 Menschen in Notunterkünften in der Hauptstadt Port-au-Prince, dem Südosten der Insel und in Grande Anse verteilt. In Jérémie sind 16 CARE-Mitarbeiter vor Ort und verteilen aktuell warme Mahlzeiten und Trinkwasser. In den kommenden Tagen sollen zudem Plastikplanen und Hygiene-CARE-Pakete so schnell wie möglich in den am schwersten betroffenen Gebieten verteilt werden.



    „Unsere größte Sorge ist derzeit, dass wir vermehrt von Cholerafällen in den Überflutungsgebieten hören“, berichtet CARE-Helfer Vigreux. „Jetzt kommt es darauf an, in der Katastrophenregion so schnell wie möglich den Zugang zu sauberem Trinkwasser und eine medizinische Versorgung der Erkrankten sicherzustellen. Im Moment müssen sie in Krankenhäusern ohne Strom versorgt werden.“



    CARE bittet dringend um Spenden, um die Nothilfe jetzt schnell ausweiten zu können:

    Spenden: Sparkasse KölnBonn

    IBAN: DE93 3705 0198 0000 0440 40

    BIC: COLSDE33

    www.care.de/spenden

    Stichwort: Haiti Hilfe



    Das Bündnis Aktion Deutschland Hilft e.V., in dem CARE Mitglied ist, ruft ebenfalls zu Spenden auf:

    IBAN DE62 3702 0500 0000 1020 30

    BIC: BFSWDE33XXX

    Stichwort: Hurrikan Matthew/Karibik

Inhalte des Mitglieds carlos
Beiträge: 2625
Xobor Einfach ein eigenes Xobor Forum erstellen
Datenschutz